Published online Jan 31, 2011.
https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2011.36.1.1
Mechanical and geometric features of endodontic instruments and its clinical effect
Abstract
Introduction
The aim of this paper is to discuss the mechanical and geometric features of Nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files and its clinical effects. NiTi rotary files have been introduced to the markets with their own geometries and claims that they have better ability for the root canal shaping than their competitors.
The contents of this paper include the (possible) interrelationship between the geometries of NiTi file (eg. tip, taper, helical angle, etc) and clinical performance of the files as follows;
- Fracture modes of NiTi rotary files
- Non-cutting guiding tip and glide path
- Taper and clinical effects
- Cross-sectional area and clinical effects
- Heat treatments and surface characteristics
- Screw-in effect and preservation of root dentin integrity
- Designs for reducing screw-in effect
Conclusions
Based on the reviewed contents, clinicians may have an advice to use various brands of NiTi rotary instruments regarding their advantages which would fit for clinical situation.
Figure 1
Fracture modes of Nickel-Titanium rotary files. (a, b) Experimental files fractured from flexural fatigue. Figure (a) shows crack initiation zone (arrow) and fast fracture zone (box) which are common findings in cyclic fatigue fracture. (c, d) Experimental files fractured from torsional load. Figure (c) shows circular abrasion marks and skewed dimples at the center of rotation which are common findings in torsional fracture.
Figure 2
Non-cutting guiding tip of Nickel-Titanium rotary files. ProTaper retreatment file D1 has cutting tip.
Figure 3
Mechanical responses on bending force and torque for ProFile .06/30, ProTaper F3 and ProTaper Universal F3. (a) Bending moment needed to deflect the tip. (b) Torque required to rotate the file under 4 mm tip restriction. (c) von Mises stresses distribution under 2 mm deflection. (d) von Mises stresses distribution under 2.5 Nmm torsion load. This figure is reproduced from the International Endodontic Journal 2009;42:14-21.33
Figure 5
Various machined surface of NiTi rotary files before cyclic loading (left) and micro-cracks near the fatigue fracture area. Fine cracks that assumed an irregular path were noted in TF and RaCe, whereas ProTaper and Helix showed cracks running along the machining grooves. This figure is reproduced from the Jounal of Endodontics 2010;36:147-152.44
Figure 6
Representative von Mises stress distribution at the apical dentin during simulated shaping rotation with ProTaper at the working length: (a) the apical aspect and (b) the longitudinal section. Arrow indicates the apical constriction where maximum stress was located. The graph shows the cyclic stress profile during simulated shaping over a period of 1 second for all three rotary instruments in the location (a node of FE model) in which the highest von Mises stress was found (highest stress value for each file: ProTaper 386 MPa, ProFile 311 MPa, LightSpeed 108 MPa). This figure is cited from the Journal of Endodontics 2010;36:1195-1199.60
Figure 7
The difference of helical angle between K-file and reamer (upper). The different helical angle and pitch from GT file and FlexMaster are shown (lower).
Figure 8
Alternative pitch of RaCe and asymmetrical cross-section of Revo-S for reducing screw-in effect.
References
-
Schilder H. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974;18:269–296.
-
-
Ruddle CJ. Cleaning and shaping root canal systems. In: Cohen S, Burns RC, editors. Pathways of the pulp. 8th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby; 2002. pp. 231-291.
-
-
Schäfer E, Schulz-Bongert U, Tulus G. Comparison of hand stainless steel and nickel titanium rotary instrumentation: a clinical study. J Endod 2004;30:432–435.
-
-
Schäfer E. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments and stainless steel hand K-Flexofiles in simulated curved root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:215–220.
-
-
Patiño PV, Biedma BM, Liébana CR, Cantatore G, Bahillo JG. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 2005;31:114–116.
-
-
Câmara AS, de Castro Martins R, Viana AC, de Toledo Leonardo R, Buono VT, de Azevedo Bahia MG. Flexibility and Torsional Strength of ProTaper and ProTaper Universal Rotary Instruments Assessed by Mechanical Tests. J Endod 2009;35:113–116.
-
-
Kim JW, Park JK, Hur B, Kim HC. Comparison of shaping ability using various Nickel-Titanium rotary files and hybrid technique. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2007;32:530–541.
-
-
Hong ES, Park JK, Hur B, Kim HC. Comparison of shaping ability between various hybrid instrumentation methods with ProTaper. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006;31:11–19.
-
-
Yum J, Cheung GS, Park JK, Hur B, Kim HC. Torsional Strength and Toughness of Nickel-Titanium Rotary Files. J Endod. 2011in press (doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.11.028).
-
-
Gere JM. In: Mechanics of materials. 5th ed. Pacific Grove, California: Brooks-Cole; 2001. pp. 1-66.Chapter 1.
-
-
Oh SH, Park JK, Hur B, Kim HC. Comparison of screw-in effect of three NiTi file systems used by undergraduates. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2006;31:477–484.
-
-
Son JY, Ha JH, Kim YK. Influence of root canal curvature on the screw-in effect of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canal. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35:374–379.
-
-
Sung HJ, Ha JH, Kim SK. Influence of taper on the screw-in effect of nickel-titanium rotary files in simulated resin root canal. J Korean Acad Conserv Dent 2010;35:380–386.
-